People
Who is trained and accountable?
Use role-based credentials, team reporting, and public verification to show whether the people carrying risk have a shared standard.
Use the pack to brief boards, procurement, risk, and executives on the evidence they should expect before approving production AI systems, team rollouts, or supplier claims.
Leadership needs an inspectable basis for approving AI systems: controls, accountabilities, training proof, procurement language, monitoring, and escalation. The pack gives them a structured way to ask for that proof.
Use role-based credentials, team reporting, and public verification to show whether the people carrying risk have a shared standard.
Use PSF domains and DSA language to ask for evidence of controls, monitoring, oversight, incidents, and change management.
Use procurement and vendor-risk language to separate SOC 2, data handling, model behavior, and operational responsibility.
Use PSF and PAI-8 as the reference language for people, systems, suppliers, and controls.
Decide whether the next step is team credentials, deployment review, supplier assessment, or policy work.
Require named owners, logs, control records, training proof, incident handling, and review cadence.
Route teams into enterprise credentials, DSA, or organisation adoption when the proof gap is real.
This capture page is for senior buyers who may not need a credential today, but do need a credible way to ask what good looks like.
The pack gives senior buyers the language to ask for proof, then routes them toward the PAI surfaces that deliver it.