AI Incident Database - Incident 1044
Source evidence cited by public records. This page shows where the source is used, its trust tier, and when it was last checked in the seed.
Records using this source
- researchers
entity | 30 June 2026 | 70%
researchers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- scholars
entity | 6 Apr 2026 | 70%
scholars - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- academic-integrity
entity | 22 Oct 2025 | 70%
academic-integrity - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- peer-reviewers
entity | 28 Apr 2025 | 70%
peer-reviewers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- readers-of-scientific-publications
entity | 28 Apr 2025 | 70%
readers-of-scientific-publications - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- scientific-authors
entity | 28 Apr 2025 | 70%
scientific-authors - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- scientific-publishers
entity | 28 Apr 2025 | 70%
scientific-publishers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- scientific-record
entity | 28 Apr 2025 | 70%
scientific-record - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- Reported Emergence of 'Vegetative Electron Microscopy' in Scientific Papers Traced to Purported AI Training Data Contamination
event | 28 Apr 2025 | 82%
Researchers reportedly traced the appearance of the nonsensical phrase "vegetative electron microscopy" in scientific papers to contamination in AI training data. Testing indicated that large language models such as GPT-3, GPT-4, and Claude 3.5 may reproduce the term. The error allegedly originated from a digitization mistake that merged unrelated words during scanning, and a later translation error between Farsi and English.