AI Incident Database - Incident 1089
Source evidence cited by public records. This page shows where the source is used, its trust tier, and when it was last checked in the seed.
Records using this source
- deepfake-technology-developers
entity | 4 July 2026 | 70%
deepfake-technology-developers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- synthetic-audio-generation-technology-developers
entity | 4 July 2026 | 70%
synthetic-audio-generation-technology-developers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- epistemic-integrity
entity | 30 June 2026 | 70%
epistemic-integrity - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- general-public
entity | 29 June 2026 | 70%
general-public - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- national-security-and-intelligence-stakeholders
entity | 4 June 2026 | 70%
national-security-and-intelligence-stakeholders - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- general-public-of-sudan
entity | 18 Mar 2026 | 70%
general-public-of-sudan - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- journalists-of-sudan
entity | 31 May 2025 | 70%
journalists-of-sudan - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- political-leaders-of-sudan
entity | 31 May 2025 | 70%
political-leaders-of-sudan - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- various-actors-aligned-with-sudanese-factions
entity | 31 May 2025 | 70%
various-actors-aligned-with-sudanese-factions - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- Purported AI-Generated Content Circulates Widely in Sudan Amid Civil Conflict and Information Vacuum
event | 31 May 2025 | 78%
Purported AI-generated deepfakes have circulated widely on Sudanese social media during the ongoing conflict, allegedly spreading false claims, impersonating public figures, and distorting political discourse. Reported incidents include fabricated videos and audio used to mislead or satirize, some of which gained traction among journalists and officials. Observers warn that poor detection tools and limited moderation may be enabling the manipulation of public trust.