AI Incident Database - Incident 1407
Source evidence cited by public records. This page shows where the source is used, its trust tier, and when it was last checked in the seed.
Records using this source
- epistemic-integrity
entity | 30 June 2026 | 70%
epistemic-integrity - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- authors
entity | 28 May 2026 | 70%
authors - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- writers
entity | 28 May 2026 | 70%
writers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- academics
entity | 6 Apr 2026 | 70%
academics - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- grammarly-users
entity | 6 Apr 2026 | 70%
grammarly-users - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- journalists
entity | 6 Apr 2026 | 70%
journalists - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- julia-angwin
entity | 6 Apr 2026 | 70%
julia-angwin - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- superhuman
entity | 6 Apr 2026 | 70%
superhuman - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- Grammarly's AI Expert Review Allegedly Used Journalists' and Authors' Names Without Consent
event | 6 Apr 2026 | 82%
Grammarly's Expert Review feature allegedly used a large language model to generate editing suggestions presented under the names of journalists, authors, and academics without their consent. A federal class action filed by Julia Angwin claimed the feature misappropriated identities for commercial gain and attributed advice the named individuals never gave.