AI Incident Database - Incident 1533
Source evidence cited by public records. This page shows where the source is used, its trust tier, and when it was last checked in the seed.
Records using this source
- large-language-model-developers
entity | 4 July 2026 | 70%
large-language-model-developers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- epistemic-integrity
entity | 30 June 2026 | 70%
epistemic-integrity - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- lawyers
entity | 26 June 2026 | 70%
lawyers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- judicial-integrity
entity | 25 June 2026 | 70%
judicial-integrity - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- ai-legal-research-tool-developers
entity | 16 June 2026 | 70%
ai-legal-research-tool-developers - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- city-of-aberdeen-mississippi
entity | 16 June 2026 | 70%
city-of-aberdeen-mississippi - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- first-drafts
entity | 16 June 2026 | 70%
first-drafts - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- kathleen-m.-wilson
entity | 16 June 2026 | 70%
kathleen-m.-wilson - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- kathryn-y.-williams
entity | 16 June 2026 | 70%
kathryn-y.-williams - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- mark-mcclinton
entity | 16 June 2026 | 70%
mark-mcclinton - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- shauncey-hunter-ridgeway
entity | 16 June 2026 | 70%
shauncey-hunter-ridgeway - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- tom-withers-iii
entity | 16 June 2026 | 70%
tom-withers-iii - organisation named in the AI Incident Database harm index.
- Four Lawyers Reportedly Sanctioned After Purportedly AI-Related Hallucinated Citations Appeared in Withers v. City of Aberdeen
event | 16 June 2026 | 78%
In Withers v. City of Aberdeen, a federal judge in Mississippi reportedly sanctioned four lawyers after filings from both sides contained purportedly hallucinated legal citations linked to unverified AI use. The court said Kathleen Wilson used First Drafts to draft a filing and Kathryn Williams used an AI legal-research tool; all four attorneys were removed from the case and fined.